The power of “Liquidation Preference” Clause in Termsheets

Ever found yourself in a situation where you held a significant chunk of equity in a company, only to receive a minuscule portion of the proceeds upon exit?

It’s a scenario that often arises due to the intricacies of investment agreements, particularly the elusive liquidation preference clause. Let’s delve into this essential aspect of venture capital deals and unravel its implications.

Many entrepreneurs grapple with understanding dilution resulting from investor funding – Venture Capital or angel investors. While dilution is a common concern, another critical aspect that warrants attention is the liquidation preference clause. This clause can significantly impact the distribution of proceeds upon the sale or liquidation of a company.

Consider this scenario: An investor injects ₹3 crore into your company, securing a 30% equity stake based on a ₹10 crore valuation. However, the investor smartly negotiates a 3x liquidation preference with participation rights. Now, if the company is acquired for ₹10 crore, the investor is entitled to receive ₹9.3 crore from the proceeds, leaving the remaining 70% equity holders with a mere ₹70 lakhs, equivalent to just 7% of the total proceeds.

While this example may seem extreme, it underscores the significance of understanding and negotiating the terms of investment agreements, particularly when it comes to liquidation preferences. These clauses serve as protective measures for investors, ensuring that they recoup their investment before other equity holders receive any proceeds.

It’s essential to recognize that liquidation preference clauses come into play primarily in worst-case scenarios, such as a sale or liquidation where the company’s value is insufficient to cover all investors’ initial investments. While they offer a level of security for investors, they can disproportionately impact founders and other equity holders, especially in cases of multiple financing rounds or down rounds.

Entrepreneurs must carefully evaluate the implications of liquidation preference clauses and negotiate favorable terms to mitigate potential drawbacks. This may involve seeking caps on liquidation preferences, negotiating for non-participating rights, or exploring alternative structures that balance investor protection with equitable distribution of proceeds.

In conclusion, understanding the nuances of liquidation preference clauses is crucial for both entrepreneurs and investors involved in venture capital deals. While these clauses provide investors with a safety net in adverse scenarios, they can significantly impact the distribution of proceeds and dilute the ownership stake of founders and early stakeholders.

If this discussion has piqued your interest in the potential implications of liquidation preference clauses, I invite you to share your thoughts and insights in the comments section below. Let’s continue the conversation and delve deeper into this critical aspect of venture capital investing.

Call Now at +91 98109 23610 or email us at

Enroll in a course :

About Author: The founder of VCIFY, Puneet Suri, is a veteran of the PE/VC industry. He is an M.B.A. from IIM- Ahmedabad, and has been involved in more than fifty investments across consumer, technology and e-commerce sectors. He is based out of Gurgaon (NCR).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact Us

Copyright: © 2024 VCIFY. All Rights Reserved.